Significant changes to workers’ compensation administrative rules regarding independent medical exams (IMEs)—Effective July 1, 2006

1.                  OAR 436-010-0265(11)(b)

When scheduling an IME, the insurer must ensure that the medical provider has a “Worker IME Survey—Form 440-0858” and the insurer has instructed the provider to give the form to the worker at the time of the IME

*Note:  A copy of the form can be accessed by clicking this link—Worker IME Survey Form 440-0858

2.                  OAR 436-010-0265(13)

Requires medical service providers (physicians, occupational therapists, and physical therapists) performing Independent Medical Examinations (IMEs) & Worker Requested Medical Exams (WRMEs), including Physical Capacity Examinations (PCEs) and Work Capacity Examinations (WCEs) to be on the Worker’s Compensation Division’s (WCD) “approved list” of certified providers.  In order to be placed on the “approved list” providers must:

a.                   Hold a current license and be in good standing with the professional regulatory board that issued their license

b.                  Complete a director-approved three hour IME course (IMEA is and was the first approved training provider in Oregon)

c.                   Submit the “Application for Independent Medical Exam Service Provider Authorization—Form 440-3930”

*Note:  A copy of the form can be accessed by clicking this link—Application for Independent Medical Exam Service Provider Authorization—Form 440-3930

Allows individuals to request the WCD Director to place a provider on the “approved list” with less than three hours of training when:

a.                   Extraordinary circumstances exist.  The following factors may be considered:  medical specialty needed; number of IMEs the provider has performed in a calendar year; where the worker lives; and factors that would make three hour training unreasonable.  *Note:  This list is an “including to, but not limited” list.

OR

b.                  If the worker and insurer agree that a certain provider may perform the examination

*Note:  Providers placed on this list are limited to being on the “approved list” only for the time required for the examination at issue.

Allows WCD to sanction or exclude a provider from the “approved list” if the Director finds the provider has:

a.                   Violated the American Board of Independent Medical Examiners (ABIME) Code of Conduct (see Application for Independent Medical Exam Service Provider Authorization—Form 440-3930 for complete copy of the code)

b.                  Failed to comply with requirements of OAR 436-010-0265 (see OAR 436-010-0265 for a complete copy of the administrative rule)

c.                   Has a current restriction on their license or is under a current disciplinary action from their professional regulatory board

d.                  Has entered into a voluntary agreement with their respective professional regulatory board which the Director determines is detrimental to performing IMEs

e.                   Violated workers’ compensation laws or rules

f.                   Failed to attend training required by the Director

*Note:  Providers have 60 days to appeal the Director’s decision to exclude a provider from the “approved list.”

3.                  OAR 436-010-0265(15)

Prohibits insurers from using an IME report (includes subsequent proceedings) if the Director, Administrative Law Judge (ALJ), Workers’ Compensation Board (WCB) or court finds that the IME was performed by a provider who was not on the “approved list” at the time of the examination

4.                  OAR 436-010-0265(16)

Prohibits observers in psychological examinations unless the provider approves

Requires workers to sign the observer form located in the “Important Information About Independent Medical Exams For Injured Workers—Form 440-3923A” if the worker wants an observer present during the exam.  A provider may exclude an observer if the worker does not sign the form

*Note:  A copy of the form can be accessed by clicking this link—Important Information About Independent Medical Exams For Injured Workers—Form 440-3923A

5.                  OAR 436-010-0265(17)

Requires medical providers to give the “Worker IME Survey—Form 440-0858” to the worker after the exam.

*Note:  A copy of the form can be accessed by clicking this link—Worker IME Survey Form 440-0858

Requires medical service providers to send the insurer a copy of the IME report, and if applicable, the “Worker IME Survey—Form 440-0858” or the “Invasive Procedure—Form 440-3227”

*Note:  A copy of the forms can be accessed by clicking this link—Worker IME Survey Form 440-0858 or Invasive Procedure—Form 440-3227

Eliminates the previous rule that required IME providers to send the exam report to insurers within seven days

6.                  OAR 436-055-0265(3)

Clarifies that, for director approval, the claims examiner training curriculum (for renewal of claims examiner certification) does not need to cover all of the components listed in OAR 436-055-0085(2) and OAR 436-055-0070(6)(b)—the 3 hour training may be completed in increments.

7.                  OAR 436-060-0265(6)

Requires that the insurer send the “Worker IME Survey—Form 440-0858” to the worker with the appointment notice

*Note:  A copy of the form can be accessed by clicking this link—Worker IME Survey Form 440-0858


 

Final Version of SB 311 Administrative Rules---Effective July 1, 2006

 
Division 10 (Medical Services) (pdf)
Division 55 (Certification of Claims Examiners) (pdf)
Division 60 (Claims Administration) (pdf)

 

 

Below is a listing of links (and a brief summary) to all testimony submitted to WCD by the May 26, 2006 rulemaking deadline.

 
WCD's goal is to have permanent rules filed with the Secretary of State (and Legislative Counsel) by June 9

and to publish/post them on the Internet by June 14.

 


Exhibit #1-Dr. John Thompson (IMO physician) supporting elimination of the 7 day turnaround of IME reports.

Exhibit #2-Dr. Joseph Graffeo (ParkView Chiropractic Center) opposing elimination of the 7 day turnaround of IME reports.

Exhibit #3-Robert Neighbor opposing the elimination of the the 10 day limit on physician dispensing of prescriptions.

Exhibit #4-National Association of Chain Drug Stores opposing the elimination of the the 10 day limit on physician dispensing of prescriptions.

Exhibit #5-Dr. John DiPaola supporting elimination of the 10 day limit on physician dispensing of prescriptions.

Exhibit #6-Dr. John DiPaola supporting elimination of the 10 day limit on physician dispensing of prescriptions (additional testimony).

Exhibit #7-Dr. Marcus Checchini (Director of Pharmacy, Fred Meyer) opposing the elimination of the 10 day limit on physician dispensing of prescriptions.

Exhibit #8-Liberty Northwest position paper "Paying for Repackaged Drugs Under the California Workers' Compensation Official Medical Fee Schedule."

Exhibit #9-Oregon Grocers Association opposing the elimination of the 10 day limit on physician dispensing of prescriptions.

Exhibit #10-Associated Oregon Industries opposing the elimination of the 10 day limit on physician dispensing of prescriptions.

Exhibits #11-#18-Transcript of May 22, 2006 OAR Hearing at WCD.

Exhibit #19-Katherine Wallace (IMO) supporting elimination of the 7 day turnaround of IME reports.

Exhibit #20-Dr. David Glass supporting elimination of the 7 day turnaround of IME reports.

Exhibit #21-Dr. Fuller (IMO) supporting elimination of the 7 day turnaround of IME reports.

Exhibit #22-Dr. Lynne Belle (IMO) supporting elimination of the 7 day turnaround of IME reports.

Exhibit #23-Dr. Frederick Waller (IMO) supporting elimination of the 7 day turnaround of IME reports.

Exhibit #24-Dr. Paul Tesar (OME) supporting elimination of the 7 day turnaround of IME reports.

Exhibit #25-Dr. DiPaola supporting elimination of the 10 day limit on physician dispensing of prescriptions.

Exhibit #26-National Federation of Independent Businesses (J.L. Wilson) opposing the elimination of the the 10 day limit on physician dispensing of prescriptions.

Exhibit #27-Blount Industries opposing the elimination of the the 10 day limit on physician dispensing of prescriptions.

Exhibit #28-Liberty Northwest:  opposing language allowing referrals by attending physicians to a specialist to include authorization for specialist to provide or order all compensable medical services and treatment deemed appropriate; objection to language (OAR 436-010-230(2)(b) "the consent form must be written in a way that allows the worker to understand it"--too vague; opposing the elimination of the 10 day limit on physician dispensing of prescriptions; opposing addition of language regarding civil penalty for more than three IMEs-- unnecessary; opposing requiring insurer to send Worker IME Survey form (IME performer should provide the form); opposing elimination of the 7 day turnaround of IME reports and; identification of contradictory language regarding IME training requirement (training must cover all or some of the requirements).

Exhibit #29-Oregon State Pharmacy Association opposing the elimination of the the 10 day limit on physician dispensing of prescriptions.

Exhibit #30-Oregon Self-Insured Association: opposing the elimination of the 10 day limit on physician dispensing of prescriptions; opposing language "in addition, providers must attend any other mandatory training as determined by the director"--too broad; supporting certification of provider attesting to DVD training; supporting ability of physicians who do not perform many IMEs per year or are highly specialized to be placed temporarily on the director's approved list; supporting ability of claims examiners to petition for physician to be placed temporarily on the list (and 5 day requirement for director to respond) and; support of date stamp for receipt of Injured Worker Surveys.

Exhibit #31-WCD Medical Advisory Committee opposing the elimination of the 10 day limit on physician dispensing of prescriptions.

Exhibit #32-IMEA:  eliminate rule prohibiting use of IME report if it exceeded the "3" limitation or was conducted by a provider not on the approved WCD list; eliminate language "in addition, providers must attend any other mandatory training as determined by the director"; allow for temporary placement on the approved list (via audio or DVD training and certification of ABIME code of conduct) via claims examiner petition (with 7 day decision from director); establishment of advisory committee to advise director regarding sanctions; appeal of sanctions and; date stamp of Injured Worker Survey form.

Exhibit #33-SAIF Corporation:  choosing and changing medical service providers (addition of the following sentence, "nothing in this rule diminishes the attending physician's responsibility to fulfill all the responsibilities of an attending physician, including reporting to the insurer, authorizing time loss, and coordinating care."; department should provide a standardized form (regarding consent form for a worker to approve employer attendance at medical appointment; opposition to elimination of the 10 day limit on physician dispensing of prescriptions; questioning department's authority to dictate what documents are admissible in a legal proceeding conducted by WCB and; supporting addition of language regarding psychological exams indicating that physician has the right to refuse having an observer present during the exam.
 
 

SB 311 Administrative Rules WCD released this afternoon, 4-14-6.  This set of rules will be effective July 1, 2006.  The public hearing for oral and written testimony is scheduled for May 22, 2006 at 10 a.m.

10_06999p.doc Medical Services PROPOSED Oregon Administrative Rules Chapter 436, Division 010

436-010_55_60_70_nprh-snfi.doc Proposed amendment of workers’ compensation rules affecting injured workers, employers, medical providers, insurers, and others.

55_06999p.doc Certification of Claims Examiners PROPOSED Oregon Administrative Rules Chapter 436, Division 055  

60_06999p.doc Claims Administration PROPOSED Oregon Administrative Rules Chapter 436, Division 060,  Rules 0035 & 0095

70_06999p.doc Workers’ Benefit Fund Assessment PROPOSED Oregon Administrative Rules Chapter 436, Division 070, Rule 0020

436_05071through05080T&R Final  In the Matter of the Amendment of 436-010, Medical Services 436-015, Managed Care Organizations 436-030, Claim Closure and Reconsideration 436-035, Disability Rating Standards 436-050, Employer/Insurer Coverage Responsibility 436-055, Claims Examiner Certification 436-060, Claims Administration 436-105, Employer-at-Injury Program 436-110, Preferred Worker Program 436- 120, Vocational Assistance to Injured Workers 436-160, Electronic Data Interchange


What's happening with SB 311's implementation?    (All the links are below)
 
Following the conclusion of the legislative session the Workers' Compensation Division proposed rules to implement SB 311. 

 
  1. In November 2005 WCD convened and advisory committee to discuss the development of those rules.  IMEA had four representatives that participated George Goodman (IMEA attorney), Dan Farrington (Sunrise Medical), Chip Bartel (Public Risk Consultants), Bob Hudlow (WMCI) and Hasina Squires (IMEA Lobbyist).  The minutes from these two meetings can be accessed via the IMEA website.
  2. Thirteen individuals/groups (IMEA, Oregon Self-Insured Association, The Oregon Medical Association, WCD, Legacy, Kaiser Permanente, Dr. Joshua Harber (Bend), Dr. DiPaola (Tualatin), Liberty NW, Oregon Health Systems, Providence, Dr. David Silver, SAIF Corporation & WCD's Medical Advisory Committee) submitted testimony.
  3.  The Department adopted its first set of rules on January 1, 2006 (see website for links to the final version of adopted Division 10, 55 and 60 rules).
  4.  The next set of rules will require mandatory training and certification of physicians authorized to perform IMEs; these rules will be effective July 1, 2006 (see section 5 of SB 311).  IMEA will again participate in the development of these administrative rules.
It appears that the Department envisions the structure of the training (see current draft via website) in to include: 
 
SB 311 (history, purpose, impact)
Definition of appropriate terms
Basic medical/legal evidence
Workers compensation system
    Public policy-ORS 656.012
        Economy creates injury
        Common law expensive w/out commensurate benefit
        Exclusive remedy best option
    Principles of workers' compensation
        Employee entitled to benefits
        No fault
        Cost passed on to consumer
    IME physician role
        Unbiased, disinterested third-party
    Causation
        Connection to work
        Pre-existing conditions
        Major contributing cause/material contributing cause
        Difference between injury and occupational disease
        Complaint process
 
In addition, the Department has developed a draft outline of a "complaint" process to remove physicians from the "list"
 
IMEA intends to offer train and qualify physicians for IME certification.  IMEA has sent a training curriculum draft to the Department and expects to conduct its first training seminar on March 20th in Portland, Oregon.
 


The Division 10, 55 and 60 administrative rules.

2006/SB 311 Division 10 OARs without strikethrough Final.pdf

2006/SB 311 Division 55 OARs without strikethrough Final.pdf

2006/SB 311 Division 60 OARs without strikethrough Final.pdf




Website is maintained by Carrie Ann  with IMEA, please contact me if you have any questions about this site.
Site last updated
Monday, February 18, 2008 04:21 PM